The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I know some really fit people that are getting dumb they'll tell you everything about sets and reps but I'm like listen you gota four PhDs. These aren't the the exercise physiologists I'm referring to, but you got four PhDs in in kettle bells and nutrition and that you've given yourself through YouTube. Like, read a hard book, read a fiction book, read a kids book for God's sake, you know, like you got to balance yourself out.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.