The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
in the first indication that we're aiming at we are hoping to implant a series of these electrodes into the brains of people that have had a bad spinal cord injury so people that are essentially quadriplegic they have perfect brains but they can't move use them to move their body they can't move their arms or legs because of some high-level spinal cord damage
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.