The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I wonder about like those people who choose to take the redeye before the like, the night before the morning of the meeting and they're they're in this meeting after a redeye flight and it's an important meeting like you cannot be per, you know, at your best you cannot be performing at a at a cognitively superior level if you haven't slept you've been on a plane all night and you're jetlagged it's crazy
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.