The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So the theory is that like maybe when you think about a cat for example or you think the concept of a cat that the mental instantiation of that or the brain mechanism instantiation of having that thought is to run a little simulation and visual cortex that kind of includes what a cat looks like a simulation in auditory cortex that what does a cat sound like
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.