The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I have this hypothesis that they are training non-attention or brief attention by you know scrolling through movies on a you know social media platform is basically training redirecting your attention every couple seconds or or maybe every few minutes
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the more time you spend immersed in social media and it's the constant it's the barrage of information and and not just the volume of information but that you are constantly being interrupted and that most of these interruptions are intentionally designed to attract your attention and that the more people practice thinking that way or being in the world that way yes it's harder to sustain attention for long periods of time