The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
It's Paper published in the journal Neuron very fine Journal excellent paper we'll post a link to it but um has many interesting features about it's really about the study of surprise and the dopamine system but they use uh as the experimental context um people watching a game of basketball and they observe that the the reset on um sort of the Interval Timer of is essentially said anytime there's been a reversal of which team has the ball
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.