Andrew Huberman· PhD
when we go into panoram amic vision which is you know for the aicionados you can look at magnosellar vision what you're essentially doing is you're taking bigger pixels of the of the visual environment
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
when we go into panoram amic vision which is you know for the aicionados you can look at magnosellar vision what you're essentially doing is you're taking bigger pixels of the of the visual environment
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
when we look at a fixation point versus a horizon or when we go into panoramic vision and there are now >> ample data to support the idea that when we fixate on a small box like a phone or a computer or we you know we're fixated on something we're reading or paying attention to it that our level of autonomic arousal creeps up