We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
absolutely these high levels of nicotine and really any nicotine is harmful to the developing brain and our brains continue to develop until we're around 25 24 or 26 depending but to around 25 so in that process of of your brain developing of your brain changing if you introduce nicotine you're changing your brain you're changing the brain chemistry and you're so much more likely to become addicted as an adolescent and young a young adult
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the whole piece we talked about before about brain development and are we stuning or changing or or really rewiring the brain with nicotine doesn't matter what form it's in it is not good and it's not good for teenagers
I I don't think the young brain should be consuming nicotine even in these non-cancer uh causing uh forms like pouches um for a variety of reasons but mostly because the brain is so plastic at a young age anyway
I'm not a fan of nicotine use at any age, but use before age 25 is playing with fire.