Andrew Huberman· PhD
Last I saw he was still running each day, sharp as a tack and kind as always.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Last I saw he was still running each day, sharp as a tack and kind as always.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
And they're all cognitively still extremely sharp, still interested in the arts, doing science, curious about science, running laboratories, writing books, going on podcasts. I mean, it's incredible. Again, that's anecdata. But I was kind of surprised to learn that colleagues that were so intellectually strong were also so obsessed with exercise. I mean, they really are obsessed with their exercise routine and early on linked that to their, some of their intellectual vigor over time.
So I know three Nobel prize winners, which doesn't mean anything except that they did beautiful work. But the point is that they're all in their 90s. [...] All three of them either swim, jog, or play tennis, or racquetball I think is Richard's thing, multiple times per week.