Andrew Huberman· PhD
a recent meta-analysis of brain imaging studies found that people with early adverse life events often show abnormalities in emotional processing and functioning.
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
a recent meta-analysis of brain imaging studies found that people with early adverse life events often show abnormalities in emotional processing and functioning.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
There's a paper that just came out in JAMA literally in the last few days where they did a meta analysis of brain imaging studies on people with early adverse life events. And what they found is abnormalities in emotional processing, emotional functioning in people who have these. Giving strong evidence that what happens to you early in life impacts us as adults and stays with us. It changes our wiring.