The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I mean, these are the the uh digital anvils that we're shaping especially young brains on and now we're surprised like oh you know from 2010 to you know 2025 everyone's been you know progress using progressively more social media online more and oh we got brain rod and oh we and and surprise surprise like well no there's this thing called plasticity that we knew about it's just we didn't understand how the brain gets modified on these platforms on these algorithms
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.