The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the monkey that was eating a normal diet as much food as it wanted when it wanted it was increasing the expression of bad genes genes involved in inflammation and stress and it was decreasing the expressions of good genes like neurotrophic factors which are important for the growth of new brain cells
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and the monkey the cowork restricted monkey had the opposite genetic expression profile so it was decreasing the bad genes it was decreasing the expression of genes involved in inflammation and stress and it was increasing the good genes