The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
in terms of the developing brain so we do believe that children and Adolescence are more vulnerable to these highly reinforcing stimuli and that the earlier that folks are exposed the more likely they are to develop an addictive process we base that on analogy with substances CU we know that the earlier that kids start using substances the more likely they are to develop a substance use disorder in their lives
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.