The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So, you're noticing every detail and you're not used to that. So, just for anyone who knows what I'm referring to here as a basian issue, um you know, you you your brain thinks, "Okay, a certain amount of memory must equal a certain amount of time."
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
turns out this is all a trick of memory, which is to say when you're in a life-threatening situation, you recruit not just your hippocampus for laying down memory, but a a secondary memory track mediated by the amydala, you're you've got this emergency control center, and you're writing down memories in this other secondary track.