The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Breathing in humans is maybe .2 cycles per second, every five seconds. Although in rodents they're up to four per second, which is pretty fast. So, but breathing has one thing which is special, that is you can readily change it. So, the degree to which the brain is using that slow signal for anything, if that becomes part of its normal signal processing, you now change it. That signal processing has to change.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.