The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And that is because the breathing signal is playing some role in the way the circuit works, and then when you disrupt that, the circuit gets a little thrown off kilter, and as you know when circuits get thrown off, the nervous system tries to adjust in some way or another, and it turns out at least for breathing for some evolutionary reason, or just by happenstance, it seems to improve our emotional function, and our cognitive function.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
And when you disrupt it, the circuit gets a little thrown off kilter. And when as you know when this when circuits get thrown off the nervous system tries to adjust in some way or another. And it turns out at least for breathing for some evolutionary reason or just by happen stance it seems to improve our emotional function or our cognitive function.