The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if you precede that task with a task where people are foraging for points on a screen there's hidden it's like a visual kind of thing and you're you're just looking for stuff if the uh if the points are really dispersed and spread out then people we don't know how long that kind of after effect less but then people are way more kind of hyp explorers with the words in the later
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.