The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
PACE score predicts the physiological, structural, and biochemical markers of aging and damage in the body. Two examples here: 1. PACE predicts brain age (left). 2. PACE predicts facial aging (right), the picture is AI generated merging facial aging features of people all chronologically 45, with increasing pace rates)
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.