The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
you're right when you and I met we had much greater processing power and like that's great we we could Sprint better say but life isn't a Sprint right it was it was fun to be able to Sprint when we could Sprint really really well but I I hope and believe that we're both smarter now even though if we stop and look at our processing power that we can see the change for the negative but that's one factor that's negative I mean overall I I think and hope that we're wiser and happier
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
but we have such a bias in us a salience bias towards the negative so we look and say oh look I could do so much more before I could hold so much more in working memory I was so much faster look I'm getting old okay the trade-off for that of of increased intrinsic knowledge things we know without having to think about it that reside in our unconscious mind you know we we don't value that as much
but we have such a bias in us a Salient bias towards the negative so we look and say oh look I could do so much more before I could hold so much more in working memory I was so much faster look I'm getting old okay the tradeoff for that of of increased intrinsic knowledge things we know without having to think about it that reside in our unconscious mind you know we we don't value that as much