The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I was seeing double it was pretty eerie and then it became downright scary because I didn't recover my double vision until they patched one of the eyes forcing me to used the other eye that had been closed the entire time and fortunately this was done early enough and it I was young enough that within I think it was about a day or so I restored what normal vision however my depth perception is terrible
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.