Peter Attia· MD
it is difficult to draw the line this is one of the main reasons that is the Ignacio of mild cognitive impairment has been elusive
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
it is difficult to draw the line this is one of the main reasons that is the Ignacio of mild cognitive impairment has been elusive
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if you then translate that to what we might call some kind of pathological cognitive decline which would then lead into Frank dementia which is — sort of a long-term loss of significant — cognitive capacity or you know cognitive dysfunction then you might see an accelerated trajectory so there's some period of what we call Mild cognitive impairment which you can diagnose with some standardized cognitive tests and then eventually that will continue into Frank dementia
and there are probably multiple things that drive both of those paths
if you then transl translate that to what we might call some kind of pathological cognitive decline which would then lead into Frank dementia which is um sort of a longterm loss of significant uh cognitive capacity or you know cognitive dysfunction then you might see an accelerated trajectory so there's some period of what we call Mild cognitive impairment which you can uh diagnose with some standardized cognitive tests and then eventually that will continue into uh Frank dementia