The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
we see an inverse relationship in a massive metaanalysis I mean this isn't my study this is National National toxicology program a massive metaanalysis and and the determination was that there was a an inverse correlation between the amount of fluoride and and IQ especially in prepubescent teens
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the national toxicology program did a survey um I want to say I don't want to misquote it was about 3600 municipalities in the United States um it was it was originally suppressed they actually got it the the report released by Court subpoena suppressed oh yeah it was suppressed until March of last year like so many good research findings that I'm sure we'll talk about in this podcast yes yes and um and they they sued under the freedom information act and and it was released and you can Google it national toxicology program fluide um you're welcome to read the study I want to say it was about 3600 minutes IP alties 52 of 54 studies they found um an inverse relationship between IQ and fluoride concentration especially in prepubescent tees