The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So, when you stimulate the vagus nerve, using this device, and you want to get rid of tinnitus, what are the patients doing? Are you capturing exactly what frequency the sound is? - Yeah. So, we ask them what their frequency is. - Mm-hmm. - We do an audiogram, we can tell what their frequency where they've lost are, but we don't know what their brain is rewired to play in their head.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.