The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And in doing that, you discover certain ways in which you are proficient in certain ways, in which you are less proficient, you discover that the other person actually tends to cheat a little bit or the other person is extremely rigid about the rules, or maybe it is extremely rigid about the way they organize their pieces on the board, or they're crossing the line into your side of the tennis court.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.