The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
but what I like about it is it's actually trying to get at a higher level cognitive state from the biometrics or the that you're measuring. And that to me is an exciting really exciting direction is when you're actually doing something that you could make a decision about how I engage in my work or how I engage in my training or my life based on that data about my cognitive state and how effective I'm going to be.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
One interesting company that I think is uh worth mentioning is Pyson. and Python, you know, again, they've got a form factor that's, you know, like a Timex watch or they're partnered with Timex, but they're measuring um are you familiar with Python? >> No. >> Okay. So, they're ma measuring psycho motor vigilance. So you know really trying to understand it's like a ENG electron neurom modulation and they're trying to understand fatigue and and neural attentiveness in a way that is you know continuous and useful for say high-risk operations or uh training uh your whether be it in sport