Andrew Huberman· PhD
so this gets back to qqr that was presented in the first episode um nothing wrong with your memory by the way well I don't know about that but um the um the qqt formula was was described in the first episode
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so this gets back to qqr that was presented in the first episode um nothing wrong with your memory by the way well I don't know about that but um the um the qqt formula was was described in the first episode
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.