The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
if you can change the environment they're in or you can change uh the state that they're in behavioral State cognitive State emotional state then um that's an effective potentially effective practical ethical right way of of having the kind of same or similar impact
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
but I think that most people are not familiar with using Behavior as a way to increase their endogenous release of the neurochemicals that increase arousal and attention and um we tend to over rely on pharmacology
what I love is that the behavioral stuff is quite potent in its ability to tap into these systems is it the same as taking X number of milligrams of Aderall or vents no but it certainly gives people at least an additional line of Entry to explore and given that these things are low cost or zero cost typically zero cost they's just a little bit of time investment and that they also do other healthy things for us