The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if you look at the Daton super agers and people similar to them you'll find are always engaged in some activity that's hard for them they're always trying to learn something and they have a sort of playfulness about it but they seek out those friction points
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
these people are regularly engaging in things that are hard for them and challenging and they've embraced that challenge
it seems that not only do they maintain cognitive function later in life but that seems to be related to their regular engagement in challenging things