The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
The downstream system just has to act as it did before. It says, "Oh, everything's of equal value. Just stay stay put." So I've always thought about Parkinson's as an active freezing disease that the nervous system is doing exactly what it would do if because it takes energy to transition from where you are to doing the next thing. Why do that if it's there's nothing more valuable there.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.