Andrew Huberman· PhD
and um we know that the vagal pathway is involved because it seems at least partially necessary if you sever that you give a vagotomy then the uh this effect is is blunted or eliminated
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and um we know that the vagal pathway is involved because it seems at least partially necessary if you sever that you give a vagotomy then the uh this effect is is blunted or eliminated
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.