We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
then right when they're you know two three four years old you're giving them an iPad which is extremely high and blue light and flicker it's so dopam energic and they're learning they're building these cognitive circuits they're you know taking in the input signals to build their biology around that environment and they're optimizing for an artificial reality not the real world
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.