The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
of molecules called trophic factors that you're well acquainted with that actually change the shape of the eyeball so it's not really the structure of the retina or the lens of the cornea the actual degree of elongation of the eyeball changes changing the way the the retina sits relative to the lens and that seems to be light dependent early in life and uh which gives rise to uh uh to uh a higher incidence of myopia
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.