The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
your science paper, stimulating nucleus basalis while exposing animals to a eight kilohertz tone. - I believe it was. - Mm-hmm. - And showing this massive rewiring of the adult auditory cortex to over-represent that tone, when I saw those images, I can still see them in my mind, they're blue and purple and, like, I know exactly what they look like, and it's just like, wow.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.