Andrew Huberman· PhD
Uh and so their true competence is more likely to be reflected in the test uh uh and not have it degraded by this kind of added stress and anxiety.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Uh and so their true competence is more likely to be reflected in the test uh uh and not have it degraded by this kind of added stress and anxiety.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
And what we found is that the math standardized math scores of the students who were taught by teachers randomly assigned to the well-being training was significantly greater than the scores of the students who are taught by teachers randomly assigned to the control group.