The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
This wasn't supposed to be possible, right? Critical periods are over. These are adult animals. It shouldn't happen. And then when I learned about the Recanzone and Merzenich work, that you were talking about of whatever the subjects are attending to, either touch or hearing, that's where the plasticity occurred.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.