Andrew Huberman· PhD
So they not only did this, I think those patients were in their 60s, then they died of cancer. But these new studies looking across the timeline, can we see, because the other thing was, yeah,
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So they not only did this, I think those patients were in their 60s, then they died of cancer. But these new studies looking across the timeline, can we see, because the other thing was, yeah,
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So after that study, which was quite a while ago, uh there are more recent studies, still controversial, but um showing and demonstrating using even new and better techniques than were used in that that original Rusty Gage study, which was groundbreaking at the time that um that suggest and I think show that there are new neurons born in adult human brains into the ninth decade of life.