The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
people are much better at manipulating faces and vases in their Mind's Eye of course only once they've drawn them out physically with their hand as I mentioned before then they are manipulating abstract objects like impossible figures in part because by labeling them faces and vases people are able to capture a lot of other neural Machinery that's related to faces and bases
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.