The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
The result then is that the retina has this sort of a representation of the visual world but it has 20 different representations not one it's not one picture that comes out of the retina and gets sent to the brain no no no it's 20 different pictures and you can think of maybe as 20 different photoshopped pictures but one of them has the edges highlighted one of them has the colors highlighted one of them has movement uh encoded in it
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.