Andrew Huberman· PhD
it has to to guess at what the causes of those signals are in order to stay alive
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it has to to guess at what the causes of those signals are in order to stay alive
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the brain just has a massive continuous inverse problem that it has to deal with all the time like it can't have it doesn't have access to all the information it's just a guessing machine it's a guessing machine