The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
we know where this comes from Mostly it's it's it's coming from the hippo campus right which one thing about the campus that's amazing is that it's it's almost atemporal it doesn't actually have a time stamp and so what it does is it takes snapshots of epithetic memories that have happened in the past reassembles them so that we can mentally time travel and then figure out these different future scenarios of what might happen
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
But what people have started to realize that it's not just memory. It's not just putting together associations for what, where, and when of of events that happened in our past, but it's putting together information that is in our long-term memory banks in interesting new ways. I'm talking about imagination. So, without the hippocampus, yes, you can't remember things, but actually, you're not able to imagine uh events or situations that you've never experienced before.