The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
More real estate, more neurological cortex real estate is taken up by the visual sense than any other sense, more than taste, touch, smell, right? Vision gets more real estate, gets more neurological processing space than any other sense, why is that?
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the brain uses about 40 to 50% of its total real estate for vision.
and about half of the overall brain structure deals with vision in some capacity
and that's why for example when people have a stroke there's almost always some component of visual involvement in a stroke