The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I have been fascinated by this for a long time about how we sometimes know, okay, my future self is going to act badly in this situation. So, I'm going to do something now so that my future self can't act badly.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So the example you gave a few minutes ago about locking up your phone in one of these lock boxes is a perfect example because what you're making sure is that the Andrew of two hours from now can't do the wrong thing because you know he might you know he's going to be tempted.
So he's lashing him to the mass. And what I've been fascinated by is the ways that we do this in our lives all the time.