The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
You want to keep making errors for this period of time that I'm saying will last anywhere for about 7 to 30 minutes. It is exceedingly frustrating, but that frustration, it liberates the chemical cues that signal that plasticity needs to happen and they also signal the particular neurons that are active.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
it is exceedingly frustrating but that frustration it liberates the chemical cues that signal that plasticity needs to happen
so that 7 to 30 minute intense learning about specifically about making errors I want to really underscore that and it's not about uh as I mentioned before coming up with some little hack or trick or um or something of that sort it's really about trying to cue the nervous system that something needs to change because otherwise it simply won't change