The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And like I said before, the brain has really evolved to perceive and manage senses, and it also provides a tremendous therapeutic potential because it's easier to fix sensory dysfunction than to fix brain function. But the brain will take care of it if it's given corrected input, and we already know that from the tremendous success of cochlear implants, which are the most successful neural prosthesis out there.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.