Andrew Huberman· PhD
What's scary is that ratio continues to change from early adulthood. So you get you get a continuous basically degradation of that signal
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
What's scary is that ratio continues to change from early adulthood. So you get you get a continuous basically degradation of that signal
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So if you look for what is only predicted of cognitive function based on a memory test, we find these synaptic proteins are very strong predictors.