The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I could imagine one hypothesis that it's the uh kind of irregularity of nature environments, right? I mean, maybe trees are spaced out, you know, in perfect spacing like on Palm Drive at Stanford. It's like it looks like a it it speaks to the engineering department that there's it's set at such even intervals, right? But, um, typically when you're in the forest um or nature, there there's also things to break up that regularity.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.