Andrew Huberman· PhD
But the creative implementation is a very linear and focused and deliberate process, much like the highly focused state, that I described.
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
But the creative implementation is a very linear and focused and deliberate process, much like the highly focused state, that I described.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Linear focus and strategy implementation is best served by high alert states, although not too alert, and how creative states, at least the first phase of creativity, which is the creative arrangement, kind of brainstorming stage is supported by states of kind of relaxation or even slightly sleepy.
Now, that gets us more to the kind of late afternoon evening. Now I am, as I mentioned before, I'm a proponent of getting sunlight in the evening as well.
where we have alertness generally we are good at linear implementation we're good at activating the no-go pathway and suppressing action and we're good at at pursuing particular goals and and strategy implementation and where we tend to be more relaxed and we tend to be almost in a kind of sleepy mode so for me coming out of one of these non-sleep deep breath modes are or sleep that's when we tend to be better at novel configurations of existing elements which is creativity