The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
when we are in a state of elevated arousal our visual aperture shrinks I'm sure you're familiar with this and we slice time more finely much you know it's like a higher frame rate right which is why people who for instance see a a devastating traumatic car crash report seeing experiencing things in slow motion right because their frame rate is high like a slow motion video
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.