Andrew Huberman· PhD
even if you're getting you know 40 or 50% or less accurate on those tests that you take immediately after the studying period that's still going to be a better strategy than rereading the material
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
even if you're getting you know 40 or 50% or less accurate on those tests that you take immediately after the studying period that's still going to be a better strategy than rereading the material
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
how much improvement do you think you get from testing yourself once on new material do you think it's a you know 10% Improvement a 20% Improvement so here I'm just comparing to testing yourself once on material that you were just exposed to For the First Time versus not testing yourself at all okay how how much do you think you improve the answer is about 50%