Direct evidence is thin. The claim is plausible and aligns with adjacent findings, but there isn't yet a body of high-quality work that would let us call it well-supported on its own terms.
I'm aware of those ideas, but they're controversial. Uh, one of the things that you want to do for injury to the brain is to decrease swelling. And uh, one of the ways that you decrease swelling in many parts of the body is to cool. Uh, uh, it it decreases inflammation, it decreases the blood flow. Uh, so, you know, I I think it's a really interesting topic and it's something that should be investigated.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.